Key words: ethics, drones, investigator impact, monitoring, technology, unmanned aerial vehicle
References
ALTENA, B. & GOEDEMÉ, T. 2014. Assessing UAV platform types and optical sensor specifications. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II-5: 17-24. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-17-2014.
ANDERSON, D.W. & KEITH, J.O. 1980. The human influence on seabird nesting success: conservation implications. Biological Conservation 18: 65-80.
BEALE, C.M. & MONAGHAN, P. 2004. Human disturbance: people as predation‐free predators? Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 335-343.
BERGENAS, J., STOHL, R. & GEORGIEFF, A. 2013. The other side of drones: saving wildlife in Africa and managing global crime. Conflict Trends 3: 3-9.
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL. 2015. Global Conservation Strategy. [Available online at: http://www.birdlife.org/worldwide/partnership/global-conservation-strategy. Accessed 24 June 2015].
BLACKMER, A.L., ACKERMAN, J.T. & NEVITT, G.A. 2004. Effects of investigator disturbance on hatching success and nest-site fidelity in a long-lived seabird, Leach's storm-petrel. Biological Conservation 116: 141-148.
CADIOU, B. & MONNAT, J.Y. 1996. Parental attendance and squatting in the kittiwake Rissa tridactyla during the rearing period. Bird Study 43: 164-171.
CAREY, M.J. 2009. The effects of investigator disturbance on procellariiform seabirds: a review. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 36: 367-377.
CHABOT, D. & BIRD, D.M. 2015. Wildlife research and management methods in the 21st century: Where do unmanned aircraft fit in? 1. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 137-155.
CHABOT, D., CRAIK, S.R. & BIRD, D.M., 2015. Population census of a large common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft. PloS One 10: e0122588.
CROXALL, J.P., BUTCHART, S.H., LASCELLES, B., ET AL. 2012. Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conservation International 22: 1-34.
CRUTSINGER, G.M., SHORT, J. & SOLLENBERGER, R. 2016. The future of UAVs in ecology: an insider perspective from the Silicon Valley drone industry. Journal of Unmanned Aerial Systems 4: 161-168.
DULAVA, S., BEAN, W.T. & RICHMOND, O.M. 2015. Environmental reviews and case studies: applications of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for waterbird surveys. Environmental Practice 17: 201-210.
FEARE, C. J. 1976. The breeding of the Sooty Tern Sterna fuscata in the Seychelles and the effects of experimental removal of its eggs. Journal of Zoology 179: 317-360.
FOWLER, G. S. 1999. Behavioral and hormonal responses of Magellanic penguins (Spheniscus magellanicus) to tourism and nest site visitation. Biological Conservation 90: 143-149.
GOEBEL, M.E., PERRYMAN, W.L., HINKE, J.T., ET AL. 2015. A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators. Polar Biology 38: 619-630.
GÖTMARK, F. 1992. The effects of investigator disturbance on nesting birds. In: POWER, D.M. (Ed.) Current Ornithology. Springer. pp. 63-104.
GRÉMILLET, D., PUECH, W., GARCON, V., ET AL. 2012. Robots in ecology: welcome to the machine. Open Journal of Ecology 2: 49-57.
HICKEY, J.J. 1955. Some American population research on gallinaceous birds. In: WOLFSON, A. (Ed.) Recent Studies in Avian Biology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. pp. 326-396.
HIRSCH, P.D., ADAMS, W.M., BROSIUS, J.P., ET AL. 2011. Acknowledging conservation trade‐offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology 25: 259-264.
HODGSON, J.C., BAYLIS, S.M., MOTT, R., ET AL. 2016. Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles. Scientific Reports 6: 22574.
International Union for Conservation of Nature. 2015. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [Online]. [Available online at: www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 14 September 2016].
KEMPER, G. & VASEL, R. 2016. Multi sensor and platforms setups for various airborne applications. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences XLI-B1: 217-220. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B1-217-2016.
KOSKI, W., ABGRALL, P. & YAZVENKO, S. 2010. An inventory and evaluation of unmanned aerial systems for offshore surveys of marine mammals. Journal of Cetacean Research and Management, 11: 239-247.
LINCHANT, J., LISEIN, J., SEMEKI, J., ET AL. 2015. Are unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges. Mammal Review 45: 239-252.
McCLELLAND, G., BOND, A., SARDANA, A., ET AL. 2016. Rapid population estimate of a surface-nesting seabird on a remote island using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle. Marine Ornithology 44: 215-220.
NIMON, A.J., SCHROTER, R.C. & STONEHOUSE, B. 1995. Heart rate of disturbed penguins. Nature 374: 6521.
NISBET, I.C. & PAUL, E. 2004. RE: Ethical issues concerning animal research outside the laboratory. ILAR Journal 45: 375-377.
RATCLIFFE, N., GUIHEN, D., ROBST, J., ET AL. 2015. A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs 1. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3: 95-101.
RÜMMLER, M.C., MUSTAFA, O., MAERCKER, J., ET AL. 2015. Measuring the influence of unmanned aerial vehicles on Adélie penguins. Polar Biology 39: 1329-1334.
Sanz Muñoz, D., Pereira Valente, J.R., Cerro Giner, J.D., ET AL. 2012. Risk analysis for UAV safe operations: a rationalization for an agricultural environment. In: PERRUZZI, A. (Ed.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Robotics and Associated High-Technologies and Equipment for Agriculture: Applications of Automated Systems and Robotics for Crop Protection in Sustainable Precision Agriculture (RHEA-2012). Pisa, Italy: Pisa University Press. pp. 235-240.
SARDÀ‐PALOMERA, F., BOTA, G., VINOLO, C., ET AL. 2012. Fine‐scale bird monitoring from light unmanned aircraft systems. Ibis 154: 177-183.
SCHIFFMAN, R. 2014. Drones flying high as new tool for field biologists. Science 344: 459-459.
SINIBALDI, G. & MARINO, L. 2013. Experimental analysis on the noise of propellers for small UAV. Applied Acoustics 74: 79-88.
SMITH, C.E., SYKORA-BODIE, S.T., BLOODWORTH, B., ET AL. 2016. Assessment of known impacts of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) on marine mammals: data gaps and recommendations for researchers in the United States 1. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 1-14.
SWENSON, J.E., SANDEGREN, F., BRUNBERG, S., ET AL. 1997. Winter den abandonment by brown bears Ursus arctos: causes and consequences. Wildlife Biology 3: 35-38.
VAN GEMERT, J.C., VERSCHOOR, C.R., METTES, P., EPEMA K., KOH L.P. & WICH, S. 2015. Nature conservation drones for automatic localization and counting of animals. In: AGAPITO L., BRONSTEIN M. & ROTHER C. (Eds.) Computer Vision – ECCV 2014 Workshops. ECCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 8925. Springer. pp. 255-270. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16178-5 17.
VAS, E., LESCROËL, A., DURIEZ, O., BOGUSZEWSKI, G. & GRÉMILLET, D. 2015. Approaching birds with drones: first experiments and ethical guidelines. Biology Letters 11: 20140754. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0754.
VERMEULEN, C., LEJEUNE, P., LISEIN, J., ET AL. 2013. Unmanned aerial survey of elephants. PloS One 8: 1-7.
WARHAM, J. 1990. The Petrels: Their Ecology and Breeding Systems. London, UK: Academic Press.
WEISSENSTEINER, M.H., POELSTRA, J.W. & WOLF, J.B. 2015. Low‐budget ready‐to‐fly unmanned aerial vehicles: an effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy‐breeding bird species. Journal of Avian Biology 464: 425-430.
WICH, S., DELLATORE, D., HOUGHTON, M., ET AL. 2015. A preliminary assessment of using conservation drones for Sumatran orang-utan (Pongo abelii) distribution and density 1. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 4: 1-8.
WINKER, K., REED, J. M., ESCALANTE, P., ET AL. 2010. The importance, effects, and ethics of bird collecting. Auk 127: 690-695.
YOUNG, E. 1994. Skua and Penguin: Predator and Prey. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.