Volume 45, No. 2
Volumes > 38 (2010-->)
- Volume 52, No. 2, 2024
- Volume 52, No. 1, 2024
- Volume 51, No. 2, 2023
- Volume 51, No. 1, 2023
- Volume 50, No. 2, 2022
- Volume 50, No. 1, 2022
- Volume 49, No. 2, 2021
- Volume 49, No. 1, 2021
- Volume 48, No. 2, 2020
- Volume 48, No. 1, 2020
- Volume 47, No. 2, 2019
- Volume 47, No. 1, 2019
- Volume 46, No. 2, 2018
- Volume 46, No. 1, 2018
- Volume 45, No. 2, 2017
- Volume 45, No. 1, 2017
- Volume 44, No. 2, 2016
- Volume 44, No. 1, 2016
- Volume 43, No. 2, 2015
- Volume 43, No. 1, 2015
- Volume 42, No. 2, 2014
- Volume 42, No. 1, 2014
- Volume 41, No. 2, 2013
- Volume 41, No. 1, 2013
- Volume 41, Special Issue, 2013
- Volume 40, No. 2, 2012
- Volume 40, No. 1, 2012
- Volume 39, No. 2, 2011
- Volume 39, No. 1, 2011
- Volume 38, No. 2, 2010
- Volume 38, No. 1, 2010
Volumes 28-37 (2000-09)
- Volume 37, No. 3, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 2, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 1, 2009
- Volume 36, No. 2, 2008
- Volume 36, No. 1, 2008
- Volume 35, No. 2, 2007
- Volume 35, No. 1, 2007
- Volume 34, No. 2, 2006
- Volume 34, No. 1, 2006
- Volume 33, No. 2, 2005
- Volume 33, No. 1, 2005
- Volume 32, No. 2, 2004
- Volume 32, No. 1, 2004
- Volume 31, No. 2, 2003
- Volume 31, No. 1, 2003
- Volume 30, No. 2, 2002
- Volume 30, No. 1, 2002
- Volume 29, No. 2, 2001
- Volume 29, No. 1, 2001
- Volume 28, No. 2, 2000
- Volume 28, No. 1, 2000
Volumes 18-27 (1990-99)
- Volume 27, No. 1 & 2, 1999
- Volume 26, No. 1 & 2, 1998
- Volume 24, No. 1 & 2, 1996
- Volume 25, No. 1 & 2, 1997
- Volume 23, No. 2, 1995
- Volume 23, No. 1, 1995
- Volume 22, No. 2, 1994
- Volume 22, No. 1, 1994
- Volume 21, No. 1 & 2, 1993
- Volume 20, No. 1 & 2, 1992
- Volume 19, No. 1, 1991
- Volume 18, No. 1 & 2, 1990
Volumes 5-17 (1978-89) a.k.a 'Cormorant'
- Volume 17, No. 1 & 2, 1989
- Volume 16, No. 1, 1988
- Volume 16, No. 2, 1988
- Volume 15, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 14, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 13, No. 2, 1986
- Volume 13, No. 1, 1986
- Volume 12, No. 2, 1985
- Volume 12, No. 1, 1985
- Volume 11, No. 1 & 2, 1984
- Volume 10, No. 2, 1983
- Volume 10, No. 1, 1983
- Volume 9, No. 2, 1982
- Volume 9, No. 1, 1982
- Volume 8, No. 2, 1981
- Volume 8, No. 1, 1981
- Volume 7, 1980
- Volume 5, 1978
Search by author or title:
Threats and threat status of the Westland Petrel Procellaria westlandica
Citation
WAUGH, S.M. & WILSON, K-J. 2017. Threats and threat status of the Westland Petrel Procellaria westlandica.
Marine Ornithology 45: 195
- 203
http://doi.org/10.5038/2074-1235.45.2.1228
Received 21 June 2017, accepted 21 July 2017
Date Published: 2017/10/15
Date Online: 2017/10/09
Key words: habitat degradation, New Zealand, predation, threat assessment, Westland Petrel
Abstract
Threat status assessments provide a benchmark for identifying priorities for conservation and related research for special-status species. We review data about an endemic New Zealand seabird, the Westland Petrel Procellaria westlandica, and provide information to assist future threat assessment reviews. A range of threats have potential or have already contributed to reductions in population growth at a level that may exceed 10% over 10 years (ranked 'High' or 'High potential' threats). The realised (observed) threats include landslips and extreme climate events that degrade nesting habitat; bycatch mortality in commercial, recreational, and high-seas fisheries; attraction of fledglings to lights; and the potential encroachment of pigs Sus scrofa and dogs Canis familiaris into breeding areas. Low-ranked threats (which may contribute <10% to population reduction over 10 years) include habitat degradation by browsing introduced mammals and land development; death of individuals by striking wires or buildings; disturbance at colonies; the petrels' consumption of fisheries waste and plastics; human harvest; and naturally occurring mortality such as predation by native species or entrapment in tree branches and vines. Population size estimation, demographic modelling, and trend information indicate that the population is small (~2800 breeding pairs), with very low productivity and therefore potential vulnerability to stochastic events. Recent surveys show that the area of breeding habitat occupied by the birds is only about 0.16 km2. Storm events in 2014 severely reduced habitat quality, destroyed large parts of some colonies, and increased the likelihood of further erosion and landslip for at least 75% of the global breeding population. Storm impacts at other colonies have not yet been assessed. In light of this information, we recommend immediate review of the threat status of the species and initiation of mitigation to reduce the severity of threats. The information available indicates that a relisting to IUCN Endangered status may be warranted, and that the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels threat assessments should be revised to include two high-level potential threats: pig predation and dog predation.
References
Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP). 2011. ACAP species assessment: Westland Petrel Procellaria westlandica. [Available online from: http://www.acap.aq. Accessed on 28 February 2017].
Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP). 2014. Prioritising ACAP Conservation Actions - Update and Report to MOP5. Advisory Committee 8, Document 14, Revision 2. [Available online at: https://www.acap.aq/en/advisory-committee/ac8/ac8-meeting-documents/2222-ac8-doc-14-rev-2-prioritising-acap-conservation-actions-update-and-report-to-mop5/file.pdf. Accessed on 13 September 2017.]
Baker, G.B, Hedley, G. & Cunningham, R. 2011. Data collection of demographic, distributional and trophic information on the westland petrel to allow estimation of effects of fishing on population viability. Contract report to the Ministry of Fisheries for project PRO2006-01J. Kettering, Tasmania: Latitude 42 Environmental Consultants.
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL. 2016. Procellaria westlandica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22698155A93665345. doi:10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22698155A93665345.en.
BRINKLEY, E.S., HOWELL, S.N.G., FORCE, M.P., SPEAR L.B. & AINLEY, D.G. 2000. Status of the Westland petrel (Procellaria westlandica) off South America. Notornis 47: 179-183.
BRISKIE, J.V. & MacKINTOSH, M. 2004. Hatching failure increases with severity of population bottlenecks in birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 558-561.
CROXALL, J.P., BUTCHART, S.H., LASCELLES, B.E.N., STATTERSFIELD, A.J., SULLIVAN, B.E.N., SYMES, A. & TAYLOR, P.R., 2012. Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conservation International 22: 1-34.
FALLA, R.A. 1946. An undescribed form of the Black petrel. Records of the Canterbury Museum 5: 111-113.
Freeman, A.N.D. 1998. Diet of Westland petrels Procellaria westlandica, the importance of fisheries waste during chick-rearing. Emu 98: 36-43.
Freeman, A.N.D. & Smith, P.J. 1998. Iso-electric focusing and the identification of fisheries waste in the diet of Westland petrels (Procellaria westlandica). New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 32: 177-180.
Freeman, A.N.D. & Wilson, K.-J. 2002. Westland petrels and hoki fishery waste: opportunistic use of a readily available resource. Notornis 49: 139-144.
GIS Development Team. 2016. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation.
INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR THE CONSERVATION OF NATURE (IUCN). 2012. IUCN Redlist Categories and Criteria. Version 3.1. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
JAMIESON, I.G. 2011. Founder effects, inbreeding, and loss of genetic diversity in four avian reintroduction programs. Conservation Biology 25: 115-123.
Jamieson S.E., Tennyson. A.J.D., Crotty, E., Miskelly, C.M., Taylor G.A., Waugh. S.M. & Wilson, K.-J. 2016. A review of the distribution and size of prion (Pachyptila spp.) colonies throughout New Zealand. Tuhinga 27: 56-80.
LANDERS, T., RAYNER, M., PHILLIPS, R. & HAUBER, M. 2011. Dynamics of seasonal movements by a trans-pacific migrant, the Westland petrel. Condor 113: 71-79.
Lyall, J., Taylor, G. & Adams, L. 2004. Westland petrel (Taiko) recovery plan 2004-14. Threatened Species Recovery Plan. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.
Master, L.L., Faber-Langendoen, D., Bittman, R., et al. 2012. NatureServe Conservation Status Assessments: Factors for Evaluating Species and Ecosystem Risk. Arlington, VA: NatureServe.
Podocarp broadleaved forests [Online]. New Zealand: New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. 2017. [Available online at: http://www.nzpcn.org.nz/page.aspx?ecosystems_plant_communities_forests_podocarp. Accessed 4 July 2017.]
Phillips, R.A., Gales, R., Baker, G.B., et al. 2016. The conservation status and priorities for albatrosses and large petrels. Biological Conservation 201: 169-183.
RHEIN, M., RINTOUL, S.R., AOKI, S., ET AL. (Eds.) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
RICHARD, Y., & ABRAHAM, E.R. 2015. Assessment of the risk of commercial fisheries to New Zealand seabirds, 2006-07 to 2012-13. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 162. [Available online at: https://www.mpi.govt.nz/document-vault/10523. Accessed 14 September 2017.]
Ricketts, T.H., Dinerstein, E., Boucher, T., et al. 2005. Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102: 18497-18501.
Robertson, H.A., Baird, K., Dowding, J.E., et al. 2017. Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2016. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 19. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation. [Available online at: http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/nztcs19entire.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2017.]
Rodríguez, A., Holmes, N.D., Ryan, P.G., et al. 2017. A global review of seabird mortality caused by land-based artificial lights. Conservation Biology 31: 986-1001. doi:10.1111/cobi.12900.
Townsend, A.J., de Lange, P.J., Duffy, C.A.J., Miskelly, C.M., Molloy, J. & Norton, D.A. 2008. New Zealand Threat Classification System Manual. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation.
TUCK, G.N., POLACHECK, T., CROXALL, J.P. & WEIMERSKIRCH, H. 2001. Modelling the impact of fisheries by-catches on albatross populations. Journal of Applied Ecology 38: 1182-1196.
Waugh, S.M., Barbraud, C., Adams, L., Freeman, A.N.D., Wilson, K.-J., Wood, G., Landers, T.J. & Baker, G.B. 2015a. Modeling the demography and population dynamics of a subtropical seabird, and the influence of environmental factors. Condor 117: 147-164.
WAUGH, S.M. & BARTLE, J.A. 2013. Westland Petrel. In: MISKELLY, C.M. (Ed.) New Zealand Birds Online. [Available online at: http://www.nzbirdsonline.org.nz/species/westland-petrel. Accessed 14 September 2017.]
WAUGH, S.M., DOHERTY, P.F., FREEMAN, A.N.D., ADAMS, L., WOODS, G.C., BARTLE, J.A. & HEDLEY, G.K. 2006. Demography of Westland Petrels (Procellaria westlandica), 1995-2003. Emu 106: 219-226.
Waugh, S.M., Poupart, T. & Wilson, K.-J. 2015b. Storm damage to Westland petrel colonies in 2014 from cyclone Ita. Notornis 62: 165-168.
WESTPORT NEWS, 2017. Punakaiki petrel project. Westport News 13 June 2017.
Wilson, K-J. 2016. A Review of the Biology and Ecology and an Evaluation of Threats to the Westland Petrel Procellaria westlandica. Charleston, NZ: West Coast Penguin Trust. [Available online at: http://www.bluepenguin.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/Westland-petrel-threats-report-June-2016-Kerry-Jayne-Wilson1.pdf. Accessed 14 September 2017.]
Wood, G.C. & Otley, H.M. 2013. An assessment of the breeding range, colony sizes and population of the Westland Petrel (Procellaria westlandica). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 40: 186-195.