Volume 48, No. 1
Volumes > 38 (2010-->)
- Volume 52, No. 1, 2024
- Volume 51, No. 2, 2023
- Volume 51, No. 1, 2023
- Volume 50, No. 2, 2022
- Volume 50, No. 1, 2022
- Volume 49, No. 2, 2021
- Volume 49, No. 1, 2021
- Volume 48, No. 2, 2020
- Volume 48, No. 1, 2020
- Volume 47, No. 2, 2019
- Volume 47, No. 1, 2019
- Volume 46, No. 2, 2018
- Volume 46, No. 1, 2018
- Volume 45, No. 2, 2017
- Volume 45, No. 1, 2017
- Volume 44, No. 2, 2016
- Volume 44, No. 1, 2016
- Volume 43, No. 2, 2015
- Volume 43, No. 1, 2015
- Volume 42, No. 2, 2014
- Volume 42, No. 1, 2014
- Volume 41, No. 2, 2013
- Volume 41, No. 1, 2013
- Volume 41, Special Issue, 2013
- Volume 40, No. 2, 2012
- Volume 40, No. 1, 2012
- Volume 39, No. 2, 2011
- Volume 39, No. 1, 2011
- Volume 38, No. 2, 2010
- Volume 38, No. 1, 2010
Volumes 28-37 (2000-09)
- Volume 37, No. 3, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 2, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 1, 2009
- Volume 36, No. 2, 2008
- Volume 36, No. 1, 2008
- Volume 35, No. 2, 2007
- Volume 35, No. 1, 2007
- Volume 34, No. 2, 2006
- Volume 34, No. 1, 2006
- Volume 33, No. 2, 2005
- Volume 33, No. 1, 2005
- Volume 32, No. 2, 2004
- Volume 32, No. 1, 2004
- Volume 31, No. 2, 2003
- Volume 31, No. 1, 2003
- Volume 30, No. 2, 2002
- Volume 30, No. 1, 2002
- Volume 29, No. 2, 2001
- Volume 29, No. 1, 2001
- Volume 28, No. 2, 2000
- Volume 28, No. 1, 2000
Volumes 18-27 (1990-99)
- Volume 27, No. 1 & 2, 1999
- Volume 26, No. 1 & 2, 1998
- Volume 24, No. 1 & 2, 1996
- Volume 25, No. 1 & 2, 1997
- Volume 23, No. 2, 1995
- Volume 23, No. 1, 1995
- Volume 22, No. 2, 1994
- Volume 22, No. 1, 1994
- Volume 21, No. 1 & 2, 1993
- Volume 20, No. 1 & 2, 1992
- Volume 19, No. 1, 1991
- Volume 18, No. 1 & 2, 1990
Volumes 5-17 (1978-89) a.k.a 'Cormorant'
- Volume 17, No. 1 & 2, 1989
- Volume 16, No. 1, 1988
- Volume 16, No. 2, 1988
- Volume 15, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 14, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 13, No. 2, 1986
- Volume 13, No. 1, 1986
- Volume 12, No. 2, 1985
- Volume 12, No. 1, 1985
- Volume 11, No. 1 & 2, 1984
- Volume 10, No. 2, 1983
- Volume 10, No. 1, 1983
- Volume 9, No. 2, 1982
- Volume 9, No. 1, 1982
- Volume 8, No. 2, 1981
- Volume 8, No. 1, 1981
- Volume 7, 1980
- Volume 5, 1978
Search by author or title:
Foraging seabirds respond to an intermittent meteorological event in a coastal environment
Citation
WAGGITT, J.J., TORRES, R. & FRASER, S. 2020. Foraging seabirds respond to an intermittent meteorological event in a coastal environment. Marine Ornithology 48: 125 - 131
Received 31 October 2019, accepted 17 February 2020
Date Published: 2020/04/15
Date Online: 2019/03/30
Key words: estuarine plume, foraging ecology, European Shag, Larus michahellis, Phalacrocorax aristotellis, vessel-based surveys, Yellow- legged Gull
Abstract
Temporal variations in the numbers of foraging seabirds usually coincide with concurrent variations in physical processes influencing prey availability. Responses to periodic tidal currents are commonly reported, with certain tidal states being favoured. By contrast, responses to intermittent meteorological events have rarely been reported, even though wind-driven exchanges of water masses or intrusion of estuarine plumes could have similar consequences. As large-scale offshore constructions (e.g., aquaculture, coastal defences, ports and marine renewable energy installations) and climate variations alter periodic tidal currents and intermittent meteorological events, respectively, quantifying responses to these physical processes can identify potential impacts on seabird communities. This study quantifies responses of foraging seabirds to physical processes in the Ria de Vigo, northwestern Spain. The numbers of foraging European Shags Phalacrocorax aristotellis and Yellow-legged Gulls Larus michahellis showed no response to variations in tidal current direction and speed. By contrast, both species increased in number during an estuarine plume intrusion (the Western Iberian Buoyant Plume: WIBP) following an extreme river discharge event and a period of southerly winds. These increases in numbers may be explained by the temporary combination of marine and brackish-water fauna, increasing prey biomass. The frequency of extreme river discharge events is likely to decrease in northwestern Spain. If WIBP intrusions consistently enhance prey availability, observations of large numbers of foraging seabirds using the ria could become rarer.
References
ARISTEGUI, J., ÁLVAREZ-SALGADO, X.A., BARTON, E.D., ET AL. 2006. Oceanography and fisheries of the Canary Current Iberian region of the Eastern North Atlantic. In: BRINK, K.H & ROBINSON, A.R. (Eds.). The Global Coastal Ocean: Interdisciplinary Regional Studies and Syntheses, Vol. 14. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press, pp. 877-931.
BENJAMINS, S., DALE, A., HASTIE, G., ET AL. 2015. Confusion reigns? A review of marine megafauna interactions with energetic tidal features. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 53: 1-54.
BENOIT-BIRD, K.J., WALUK, C.M. & RYAN, J.P. 2019. Forage species swarm in response to coastal upwelling. Geophysical Research Letters 46: 1537-1546.
CAMPHUYSEN, C.J., FOX, A.D., LEOPOLD, M.F. & PETERSEN, I.K. 2004. Towards standardised seabirds at sea census techniques in connection with environmental impact assessments for offshore wind farms in the U.K. COWRIE BAM 02-2002. Texel, Netherlands:Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research and the Danish National Environmental Research Institute.
CAMPHUYSEN, C.J., SHAMOUN-BARANES, J., BOUTEN, W. & GARTHE, S. 2012. Identifying ecologically important marine areas for seabirds using behavioural information in combination with distribution patterns. Biological Conservation 156: 22-29.
CARDOSO PEREIRA, S., MARTA-ALMEIDA, M., CARVALHO, A.C. & ROCHA, A. 2019. Extreme precipitation events under climate change in the Iberian Peninsula. International Journal of Climatology 40: 1255-1278
CARTER, R., 2013. Coastal Environments: An Introduction to the Physical, Ecological and Cultural Systems of Coastlines. London, UK: Academic Press.
CAZENAVE, P.W., TORRES, R. & ALLEN, J.I. 2016. Unstructured grid modelling of offshore wind farm impacts on seasonally stratified shelf seas. Progress in Oceanography 145: 25-41.
CHEN, C., LIU, H. & BEARDSLEY, R.C. 2003. An Unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: application to coastal ocean and estuaries. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 20: 159-186.
COX, S.L., EMBLING, C.B., HOSEGOOD, P.J., VOTIER, S.C. & INGRAM, S.N. 2018. Oceanographic drivers of marine mammal and seabird habitat-use across shelf-seas: a guide to key features and recommendations for future research and conservation management. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 212: 294-310.
DAUNT, F., AFANASYEV, V., SILK, J.R.D. & WANLESS, S. 2006. Extrinsic and intrinsic determinants of winter foraging and breeding phenology in a temperate seabird. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 59: 381-388.
DE DOMINICIS, M., O'HARA MURRAY, R. & WOLF, J. 2017. Multi-scale ocean response to a large tidal stream turbine array. Renewable Energy 114: 1160-1179.
DES, M., DECASTRO, M., SOUSA, M.C., DIAS, J.M. & GÓMEZ-GESTEIRA, M. 2019. Hydrodynamics of river plume intrusion into an adjacent estuary: the Minho River and Ria de Vigo. Journal of Marine Systems 189: 87-97.
EMBLING, C.B., ILLIAN, J., ARMSTRONG, E., ET AL. 2012. Investigating fine scale spatio-temporal predator-prey patterns in dynamic marine ecosystems: a functional data analysis approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 481-492.
FRASER, S.J., NIKORA, V., WILLIAMSON, B.J. & SCOTT, B.E. 2017. Hydrodynamic impacts of a marine renewable energy installation on the benthic boundary layer in a tidal channel. Energy Procedia 125: 250-259.
GILLANDERS, B.M. & KINGSFORD, M.J. 2002. Impact of changes in flow of freshwater on estuarine and open coastal habitats and the associated organisms. Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 40: 233-309.
HANEY, J.C. & LEE, D.S. 1994. Air-sea heat flux, ocean wind fields, and offshore dispersal of gulls. The Auk 111: 427-440.
HARLEY, C.D.G., HUGHES, A.R., HULTGREN, K.M., ET AL. 2006. The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecology Letters 9: 228-241.
HEATH, J.P. & GILCHRIST, H.G. 2010. When foraging becomes unprofitable: energetics of diving in tidal currents by common eiders wintering in the Arctic. Marine Ecology Progress Series 403: 279-290.
HIJMANS, R.J. 2017. Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modelling. R package version 2.1-66. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster.
HUNT, G.L., MEHLUM, F., RUSSELL, R.W., IRONS, D., DECKER, M.B. & BECKER, P.H. 1999. Physical processes, prey abundance, and the foraging ecology of seabirds. International Ornithological Congress 22: 2040-2056.
JOHNSTON, D.W. & READ, A.J. 2007. Flow-field observations of a tidally driven island wake used by marine mammals in the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Fisheries Oceanography 16: 422-435.
KÄMPF, J. & CHAPMAN, P. 2016. Upwelling Systems of the World. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
KINGSFORD, M.J. & SUTHERS, I.M. 1994. Dynamic estuarine plumes and fronts: importance to small fish and plankton in coastal waters of NSW, Australia. Continental Shelf Research 14: 655-672.
LEWIS, S., PHILLIPS, R.A., BURTHE, S.J., WANLESS, S. & DAUNT, F. 2015. Contrasting responses of male and female foraging effort to year-round wind conditions. Journal of Animal Ecology 84: 1490-1496.
MADEC, G. 2008. NEMO Ocean General Circulation Model reference manual. Vol. 4.0. Paris, France: Laboratoire d'Océanographie Dynamique et de Climatologie.
MUNILLA, I. 1997. Henslow's swimming crab (Polybius henslowii) as an important food for yellow-legged gulls (Larus cachinnans) in NW Spain. ICES Journal of Marine Science 54: 631-634.
SCOTT, B.E., WEBB, A., PALMER, M.R., EMBLING, C.B. & SHARPLES, J. 2013. Fine scale bio-physical oceanographic characteristics predict the foraging occurrence of contrasting seabird species; Gannet (Morus bassanus) and storm petrel (Hydrobates pelagicus). Progress in Oceanography 117: 118-129.
SHIELDS, M.A., WOOLF, D.K., GRIST, E.P.M., ET AL. 2011. Marine renewable energy: The ecological implications of altering the hydrodynamics of the marine environment. Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 2-9.
SIMPSON, J.H. & SHARPLES, J. 2012. Introduction to the Physical and Biological Oceanography of Shelf Seas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
SOTILLO, M.G., CAILLEAU, S., LORENTE, P., ET AL. 2015. The MyOcean IBI Ocean Forecast and Reanalysis Systems: operational products and roadmap to the future Copernicus Service. Journal of Operational Oceanography 8: 63-79.
SOUSA, M.C., VAZ, N., ALVAREZ, I., GOMEZ-GESTEIRA, M. & DIAS, J.M. 2014. Influence of the Minho River plume on the Rias Baixas (NW of the Iberian Peninsula). Journal of Marine Systems 139: 248-260.
STENSETH, N.C., OTTERSEN, G., HURRELL, J.W., ET AL. 2003. Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niño Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 2087-2096.
TASKER, M.L., JONES, P.H., DIXON, T.J. & BLAKE, B.F. 1984. Counting seabirds at sea from ships: a review of methods employed and a suggestion for a standardized approach. The Auk 101: 567-577.
TREVAIL, A.M., GREEN, J. A., SHARPLES, J., POLTON, J.A., ARNOULD, J.P.Y. & PATRICK, S.C. 2019. Environmental heterogeneity amplifies behavioural response to a temporal cycle. Oikos 128: 517-528.
VALEIRAS, J. 2003. Attendance of scavenging seabirds at trawler discards off Galicia, Spain. Scientia Marina 67: 77-82.
VELANDO, A. & FREIRE, J. 1999. Intercolony and seasonal differences in the breeding diet of European shags on the Galician coast (NW Spain). Marine Ecology Progress Series 188: 225-236.
VELANDO, A. & MUNILLA, I. 2008. Plan de Conservacion del Cormoran Monudo en el Parque Nacional de las Islas Atlanticas. Vigo. Vigo, Spain: Universidade de Vigo.
VINAGRE, C., MÁGUAS, C., CABRAL, H.N. & COSTA, M.J. 2012. Food web structure of the coastal area adjacent to the Tagus estuary revealed by stable isotope analysis. Journal of Sea Research 67: 21-26.
WAGGITT, J.J., CAZENAVE, P.W., TORRES, R., WILLIAMSON, B.J. & SCOTT, B.E. 2016a. Quantifying pursuit-diving seabirds' associations with fine-scale physical features in tidal stream environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 1653-1666.
WAGGITT, J.J., CAZENAVE, P., TORRES, R., WILLIAMSON, B.J. & SCOTT, B.E. 2016b. Predictable hydrodynamic conditions explain temporal variations in the density of benthic foraging seabirds in a tidal stream environment. ICES Journal of Marine Science 73: 2677-2686.
WAGGITT, J.J., ROBBINS, A.M.C., WADE, H.M., ET AL. 2017. Comparative studies reveal variability in the use of tidal stream environments by seabirds. Marine Policy 81: 143-152.
WAGGITT, J.J., DUNN, H.K., EVANS, P.G.H., ET AL. 2018. Regional-scale patterns in harbour porpoise occupancy of tidal stream environments. ICES Journal of Marine Science 75: 701-710.
WHEELER, A. 1969. The Fishes of the British Isles and North West Europe. London, UK: MacMillan Publishers.
WOOD, S.N. 2006. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. Boca Raton, USA: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.
ZAMON, J.E. 2001. Seal predation on salmon and forage fish schools as a function of tidal currents in the San Juan Islands, Washington, USA. Fisheries Oceanography 10: 353-366.
ZUUR, A.F., IENO, E.N., WALKER, N., SAVELIEV, A.A. & SMITH, G.M. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York, USA: Springer Publishing.