Volume 52, No. 1
Volumes > 38 (2010-->)
- Volume 52, No. 2, 2024
- Volume 52, No. 1, 2024
- Volume 51, No. 2, 2023
- Volume 51, No. 1, 2023
- Volume 50, No. 2, 2022
- Volume 50, No. 1, 2022
- Volume 49, No. 2, 2021
- Volume 49, No. 1, 2021
- Volume 48, No. 2, 2020
- Volume 48, No. 1, 2020
- Volume 47, No. 2, 2019
- Volume 47, No. 1, 2019
- Volume 46, No. 2, 2018
- Volume 46, No. 1, 2018
- Volume 45, No. 2, 2017
- Volume 45, No. 1, 2017
- Volume 44, No. 2, 2016
- Volume 44, No. 1, 2016
- Volume 43, No. 2, 2015
- Volume 43, No. 1, 2015
- Volume 42, No. 2, 2014
- Volume 42, No. 1, 2014
- Volume 41, No. 2, 2013
- Volume 41, No. 1, 2013
- Volume 41, Special Issue, 2013
- Volume 40, No. 2, 2012
- Volume 40, No. 1, 2012
- Volume 39, No. 2, 2011
- Volume 39, No. 1, 2011
- Volume 38, No. 2, 2010
- Volume 38, No. 1, 2010
Volumes 28-37 (2000-09)
- Volume 37, No. 3, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 2, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 1, 2009
- Volume 36, No. 2, 2008
- Volume 36, No. 1, 2008
- Volume 35, No. 2, 2007
- Volume 35, No. 1, 2007
- Volume 34, No. 2, 2006
- Volume 34, No. 1, 2006
- Volume 33, No. 2, 2005
- Volume 33, No. 1, 2005
- Volume 32, No. 2, 2004
- Volume 32, No. 1, 2004
- Volume 31, No. 2, 2003
- Volume 31, No. 1, 2003
- Volume 30, No. 2, 2002
- Volume 30, No. 1, 2002
- Volume 29, No. 2, 2001
- Volume 29, No. 1, 2001
- Volume 28, No. 2, 2000
- Volume 28, No. 1, 2000
Volumes 18-27 (1990-99)
- Volume 27, No. 1 & 2, 1999
- Volume 26, No. 1 & 2, 1998
- Volume 24, No. 1 & 2, 1996
- Volume 25, No. 1 & 2, 1997
- Volume 23, No. 2, 1995
- Volume 23, No. 1, 1995
- Volume 22, No. 2, 1994
- Volume 22, No. 1, 1994
- Volume 21, No. 1 & 2, 1993
- Volume 20, No. 1 & 2, 1992
- Volume 19, No. 1, 1991
- Volume 18, No. 1 & 2, 1990
Volumes 5-17 (1978-89) a.k.a 'Cormorant'
- Volume 17, No. 1 & 2, 1989
- Volume 16, No. 1, 1988
- Volume 16, No. 2, 1988
- Volume 15, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 14, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 13, No. 2, 1986
- Volume 13, No. 1, 1986
- Volume 12, No. 2, 1985
- Volume 12, No. 1, 1985
- Volume 11, No. 1 & 2, 1984
- Volume 10, No. 2, 1983
- Volume 10, No. 1, 1983
- Volume 9, No. 2, 1982
- Volume 9, No. 1, 1982
- Volume 8, No. 2, 1981
- Volume 8, No. 1, 1981
- Volume 7, 1980
- Volume 5, 1978
Search by author or title:
Ecological experiences and perceptions of small-scale gillnet and purse seine fishers on seabirds and other non-target taxa in the Humboldt Current System, Chile.
Citation
SUAZO, C.G., ANGUITA, C., OJEDA, J., LUNA-JORQUERA, G., SEPÚLVEDA, M. & YATES, O. 2024. Ecological experiences and perceptions of small-scale gillnet and purse seine fishers on seabirds and other non-target taxa in the Humboldt Current System, Chile..
Marine Ornithology 52: 27
- 36
http://doi.org/10.5038/2074-1235.52.1.1556
Received 27 July 2023, accepted 14 September 2023
Date Published: 2024/04/15
Date Online: 2024/02/10
Key words: artisanal fisheries, ecological knowledge, management, mitigation, multispecies, fisheries
Abstract
Strategies to reduce the negative impacts of fisheries on ecosystems often come into conflict with fishers who have different experiences with, and perceptions of, biodiversity compared to policy makers and fisheries managers. We interviewed 800 fishers along 2400 kilometers of the Humboldt Current System (HCS) coast, assessing fishers' perceptions of the impacts of marine predators on fishing and their proposals to reduce conflicts with small-scale net fisheries. Vessel captains saw seabirds as positive indicators of fish presence along the HCS (mean probability 62.7%). In contrast, sea lions were perceived negatively, affecting catches for all fishers and causing fishing gear damage among gillnet fishers (97.1%). Among different measures suggested by fishers to reduce conflicts with non-target taxa, night fishing and marine protected areas (MPAs) were viewed as least likely to be implemented because these affect fishing performance (6% and 13.1%) through changes to at-sea safety and fishing effort displacement, respectively. In contrast, economic compensation and culling of currently protected sea lions were the most popular but also the most sensitive measures (31% and 33%, respectively). Different dimensions of experiences and perceptions of fishers are key to the bottom-up understanding of interactions in small-scale fisheries. This is especially true when measures to mitigate their impacts do not have any consolidated installation/monitoring, which is a continuing challenge for these types of fisheries globally. This study emphasizes the role of small-scale fishers as a source of diverse ecological experiences and perceptions to complement knowledge on sensitive conservation issues.
References
ACEVEDO, J.R., AGUAYO-LOBO, A. & SIELFELD, W.K. 2003. Eventos reproductivos del león marino común, Otaria flavescens (Shaw 1800), en el norte de Chile (Pacífico suroriental). Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 38: 69-75. doi:10.4067/s0718-19572003000200003
ALEXANDRE, S., MARÇALO, A., MARQUES, T.A. ET AL. 2022. Interactions between air-breathing marine megafauna and artisanal fisheries in Southern Iberian Atlantic waters: Results from an interview survey to fishers. Fisheries Research 254: 106430. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2022.106430
BAN, N.C., WILSON, E. & NEASLOSS, D. 2020. Historical and contemporary indigenous marine conservation strategies in the North Pacific. Conservation Biology 34: 5-14. doi:10.1111/cobi.13432
BARAFF, L.S. & LOUGHLIN, T.R. 2000. Trends and potential interactions between pinnipeds and fisheries of New England and the U.S. West Coast. Marine Fisheries Review 62: 1-39.
BASTIAN, M., HEYMANN, S. & JACOMY, M. 2009. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 3: 361-362. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
BENNETT, N.J., WHITTY, T.S., FINKBEINER, E. ET AL. 2018. Environmental stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management 61: 597-614. doi:10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
BERKSTRÖM, C., PAPADOPOULOS, M., JIDDAWI, N.S. & NORDLUND, L.M. 2019. Fishers' Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) on Connectivity and Seascape Management. Frontiers in Marine Science 6: 130. doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00130
BRADSHAW, G.A. & BEKOFF, M. 2001. Ecology and social responsibility: the re-embodiment of science. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 460-465. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02204-2
CAPPOZZO, H. & PERRIN, W. 2009. South American sea lion Otaria flavescens. In: PERRIN, W., WÜRSIG, B. & THEWISSEN, J. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. Amsterdam, Nethoerlands: Academic Press/Elsevier.
CHAN, K.M.A., BALVANERA, P., BENESSAIAH, K. ET AL. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 1462-1465. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525002113
CRAWFORD, R., ELLENBERG, U., FRERE, E. ET AL. 2017. Tangled and drowned: a global review of penguin bycatch in fisheries. Endangered Species Research 34: 373-396. doi:10.3354/esr00869
CROXALL, J.P., BUTCHART, S.H.M., LASCELLES, B. ET AL. 2012. Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conservation International 22: 1-34. doi:10.1017/S0959270912000020
CURSACH, J., RAU, J.R., THER, F., VILUGRÓN, J. & TOBAR, C. 2012. Synanthropy and marine conservation: the case of the marine otter Lontra felina in Southern Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 47: 593-597.
CURSACH, J.A., RAU, J.R., THER-RÍOS, F. ET AL. 2021. Los pescadores artesanales de tres zonas costeras de Chile difieren en su percepción acerca de la situación poblacional del Pelícano de Humboldt (Pelecanus thagus). Revista Chilena de Ornitología 27: 71-76.
CURSACH, J.A., VILUGRÓN, J., TOBAR, C. ET AL. 2016. Conocimiento local sobre aves marinas por pescadores artesanales de Bahía San Pedro, costa de Purranque, centro de Chile. Revista Chilena de Ornitología 22: 120-125.
DIAS, M.P., MARTIN, R., PEARMAIN, E.J. ET AL. 2019. Threats to seabirds: A global assessment. Biological Conservation 237: 525-537. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.06.033
DÍAZ, S., PASCUAL, U., STENSEKE, M. ET AL. 2018. Assessing nature's contributions to people: Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. Science 359: 270-272. doi:10.1126/science.aap8826
Discard Reduction Plans. n.d. Valparaíso, Chile: SUBPESCA. [Accessed at http://www.subpesca.cl on 02 May 2023.]
DOLMAN, S., BAULCH, S., EVANS, P.G.H., READ, F. & RITTER, F. 2016. Towards an EU Action Plan on Cetacean Bycatch. Marine Policy 72: 67-75. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.020
GEORGE-NASCIMENTO, M., BUSTAMANTE, R. & OYARZUN, C. 1985. Feeding ecology of the South American sea lion Otaria flavescens: food contents and food selectivity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 21: 135-143. doi:10.3354/meps021135
GÓMEZ-CAMPOS, E., BORRELL, A., CARDONA, L., FORCADA, J. & AGUILAR, A. 2011. Overfishing of small pelagic fishes increases trophic overlap between immature and mature striped dolphins in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS One 6. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024554
GONZALVO, J., GIOVOS, I. & MOUTOPOULOS, D.K. 2015. Fishermen's perception on the sustainability of small-scale fisheries and dolphin-fisheries interactions in two increasingly fragile coastal ecosystems in western Greece. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 25: 95-106. doi:10.1002/aqc.2444
HALL, M.A., ALVERSON, D.L. & METUZALS, K.I. 2000. By-catch: problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 41: 204-219. doi:10.1016/S0025-326X(00)00111-9
HOOKER, S.K. & GERBER, L.R. 2004. Marine reserves as a tool for ecosystem-based management: the potential importance of megafauna. BioScience 54: 27-39. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0027:MRAATF]2.0.CO;2
LAVIGNE, D. 2003. Marine mammals and fisheries: The role of science in the culling debate. In: GALES, N., HINDELL, M. & KIRKWOOD, R. (Eds.) Marine Mammals: Fisheries, Tourism and Management Issues. Clayton, Australia: CSIRO Publishing
LIU, J., DIETZ, T., CARPENTER, S.R. ET AL. 2007. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317: 1513-1516. doi:10.1126/science.1144004
LØKKEBORG, S. 2011. Best practices to mitigate seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries-efficiency and practical applicability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 435: 285-303. doi:10.3354/meps09227
LYDAY, S.E., BALLANCE, L.T., FIELD, D.B. & DAVID HYRENBACH, K. 2015. Shearwaters as ecosystem indicators: towards fishery-independent metrics of fish abundance in the California Current. Journal of Marine Systems 146: 109-120. doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.08.010
MACHADO, A.M. da S., DAURA-JORGE, F.G., HERBST, D.F. ET AL. 2019. Artisanal fishers' perceptions of the ecosystem services derived from a dolphin-human cooperative fishing interaction in southern Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Management 173: 148-156. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.03.003
MACHADO, R., OTT, P.H., MORENO, I.B. ET AL. 2016. Operational interactions between South American sea lions and gillnet fishing in southern Brazil. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 26: 108-120. doi:10.1002/aqc.2554
MANGEL, J.C., WANG, J., ALFARO-SHIGUETO, J. ET AL. 2018. Illuminating gillnets to save seabirds and the potential for multi-taxa bycatch mitigation. Royal Society Open Science 5: 180254. doi:10.1098/rsos.180254
MELVIN, E. 2013. Criteria for best practice seabird bycatch mitigation. SBWG5 Doc 32. Fifth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. La Rochelle, France: Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels.
MELVIN, E.F., WOLFAARDT, A., CRAWFORD, R., GILMAN, E. & SUAZO, C.G. 2023. Bycatch reduction. In: YOUNG, L. & VANDERWERF, E. (Eds.) Conservation of Marine Birds. New York, USA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-88539-3.00018-2
MORENO, C., CASTRO, R., MÚJICA, L. & REYES, P. 2008. Significant conservation benefits obtained from the use of a new fishing gear in the Chilean industrial Patagonian toothfish fishery. CCAMLR Science 15: 79-91.
MORISSETTE, L., CHRISTENSEN, V. & PAULY, D. 2012. Marine mammal impacts in exploited ecosystems: would large scale culling benefit fisheries? PLoS One 7: e43966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043966
MUÑOZ, L., PAVEZ, G., QUIÑONES, R.A., OLIVA, D., SANTOS, M. & SEPÚLVEDA, M. 2013. Diet plasticity of the South American sea lion in Chile: stable isotope evidence. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 48: 613-622. doi:10.4067/s0718-19572013000300017
OJEDA, J., SALOMON, A.K., ROWE, J.K. & BAN, N.C. 2022. Reciprocal contributions between people and nature: a conceptual intervention. BioScience 72: 952-962.
OLIVEIRA, N., ALMEIDA, A.N.A., ALONSO, H. ET AL. 2021. A contribution to reducing bycatch in a high priority area for seabird conservation in Portugal. Bird Conservation International 31: 553-572. doi:10.1017/S0959270920000489
PASCUAL, U., BALVANERA, P., DÍAZ, S. ET AL. 2017. Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 26-27: 7-16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
POTT, C. & WIEDENFELD, D.A. 2017. Information gaps limit our understanding of seabird bycatch in global fisheries. Biological Conservation 210: 192-204. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.002
R CORE TEAM 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Accessed at https://www.r-project.org/ on 09 September 2018.]
REYES, P., HUCKE-GAETE, R. & TORRES-FLOREZ, J.P. 2013. First observations of operational interactions between bottom-trawling fisheries and South American sea lion, Otaria flavescens in south-central Chile. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93: 489-494. doi:10.1017/S0025315412001282
RIGBY, R.A., STASINOPOULOS, D.M. & LANE, P.W. 2005. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C: Applied Statistics 54: 507-554. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x
ROBERTSON, G., WIENECKE, B., SUAZO, C.G., LAWTON, K., ARATA, J.A. & MORENO, C. 2017. Continued increase in the number of black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophris) at Diego Ramírez, Chile. Polar Biology 40: 1035-1042. doi:10.1007/s00300-016-2028-5
ROSEN, D.A.S. & TRITES, A.W. 2000. Pollock and the decline of Steller sea lions: Testing the junk-food hypothesis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 1243-1250. doi:10.1139/z00-060
RUANO-CHAMORRO, C., SUBIDA, M. & FERNÁNDEZ, M. 2017. Fisher's perception: an alternative source of information to assess the data-poor benthic small-scale artisanal fisheries of central Chile. Ocean & Coastal Management 146: 67-76.
SENKO, J., WHITE, E.R., HEPPELL, S.S. & GERBER, L.R. 2014. Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. Animal Conservation 17: 5-18. doi:10.1111/acv.12051
SEPÚLVEDA, M., MARTÍNEZ, T., OLIVA, D. ET AL. 2018. Factors affecting the operational interaction between the South American sea lions and the artisan gillnet fishery in Chile. Fisheries Research 201: 147-152. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.01.014
SEPÚLVEDA, M., OLIVA, D.P. & PALMA, F.J. 2001. Daily and annual circarhythms activity in the South American sea lion Otaria flavescens (Carnivora: Otariidae) at the central zone of Chile. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 36: 181-187. doi:10.4067/s0718-19572001000200006
SEPÚLVEDA, M., PÉREZ, M.J., SIELFELD, W. ET AL. 2007. Operational interaction between South American sea lions Otaria flavescens and artisanal (small-scale) fishing in Chile: Results from interview surveys and on-board observations. Fisheries Research 83: 332-340. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2006.10.009
SÖFFKER, M., TRATHAN, P., CLARK, J., COLLINS, M.A., BELCHIER, M. & SCOTT, R. 2015. The impact of predation by marine mammals on Patagonian toothfish longline fisheries. PLoS One 10: e0118113. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118113
SOGA, M. & GASTON, K.J. 2016. Extinction of experience: The loss of human-nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14: 94-101. doi:10.1002/fee.1225
SUAZO, C.G., CABEZAS, L.A., MORENO, C.A. ET AL. 2014. Seabird bycatch in Chile: a synthesis of its impacts, and a review of strategies to contribute to the reduction of a global phenomenon. Pacific Seabirds 41: 1-12.
SUAZO, C.G., FRERE, E., GARCÍA, M., COCAS, L. & YATES, O. 2017. Assessment of the “Modified Purse Seine (MPS)” against ACAP best practice criteria. SBWG8 Doc21. Eighth Meeting of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group. Wellington, New Zealand: Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels.
SUAZO, C.G., SCHLATTER, R.P., ARRIAGADA, A.M., CABEZAS, L.A. & OJEDA, J. 2013. Fishermen's perceptions of interactions between seabirds and artisanal fisheries in the Chonos archipelago, Chilean Patagonia. Oryx 47: 184-189. doi:10.1017/S0030605311001815
SUBPESCA. 2023. Estado de la situación de las principales pesquerías chilenas, 2022. Valparaíso, Chile: Departamento de Pesquerías División de Administración Pesquera, Subsecretaría de Pesca y Acuicultura.
THIEL, M., MACAYA, E.C., ACUÑA, E. ET AL. 2007. The Humboldt Current System of northern and central Chile - Oceanographic processes, ecological interactions and socioeconomic feedback. Oceanography and Marine Biology 45: 195-344.
TRITES, A.W. & DONNELLY, C.P. 2003. The decline of Steller sea lions Eumetopias jubatus in Alaska: a review of the nutritional stress hypothesis. Mammal Review 33: 3-28. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00009.x
URRA, A., SEPÚLVEDA, M., OLIVA, D. ET AL. 2011. Evaluación de la interacción entre el lobo marino común y la salmonicultura para la generación de políticas públicas y privadas tendientes a mejorar la productividad del sector salmonero y la sustentabilidad del recurso lobo marino común. Valparaíso, Chile: Universidad de Valparaíso.
WANG, Y., NAUMANN, U., WRIGHT, S. & WARTON, D. 2014. mvabund: Statistical methods for analysing multivariate abundance data. [Accessed at https://rdrr.io/cran/mvabund/man/mvabund-package.html on 09 September 2018.]
WANG, Y., NAUMANN, U., WRIGHT, S.T. & WARTON, D.I. 2012. Mvabund: an R package for model-based analysis of multivariate abundance data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3: 471-474. doi:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00190.x
WARD, E.J., MARSHALL, K.N., ROSS, T. ET AL. 2015. Using citizen-science data to identify local hotspots of seabird occurrence. PeerJ 3: e704. doi:10.7717/peerj.704
WICKENS, P. 1995. A Review of Operational Interactions Between Pinnipeds and Fisheries. FAO Technical Paper 346. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.