Volume 44, No. 2
Volumes > 38 (2010-->)
- Volume 52, No. 2, 2024
- Volume 52, No. 1, 2024
- Volume 51, No. 2, 2023
- Volume 51, No. 1, 2023
- Volume 50, No. 2, 2022
- Volume 50, No. 1, 2022
- Volume 49, No. 2, 2021
- Volume 49, No. 1, 2021
- Volume 48, No. 2, 2020
- Volume 48, No. 1, 2020
- Volume 47, No. 2, 2019
- Volume 47, No. 1, 2019
- Volume 46, No. 2, 2018
- Volume 46, No. 1, 2018
- Volume 45, No. 2, 2017
- Volume 45, No. 1, 2017
- Volume 44, No. 2, 2016
- Volume 44, No. 1, 2016
- Volume 43, No. 2, 2015
- Volume 43, No. 1, 2015
- Volume 42, No. 2, 2014
- Volume 42, No. 1, 2014
- Volume 41, No. 2, 2013
- Volume 41, No. 1, 2013
- Volume 41, Special Issue, 2013
- Volume 40, No. 2, 2012
- Volume 40, No. 1, 2012
- Volume 39, No. 2, 2011
- Volume 39, No. 1, 2011
- Volume 38, No. 2, 2010
- Volume 38, No. 1, 2010
Volumes 28-37 (2000-09)
- Volume 37, No. 3, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 2, 2009
- Volume 37, No. 1, 2009
- Volume 36, No. 2, 2008
- Volume 36, No. 1, 2008
- Volume 35, No. 2, 2007
- Volume 35, No. 1, 2007
- Volume 34, No. 2, 2006
- Volume 34, No. 1, 2006
- Volume 33, No. 2, 2005
- Volume 33, No. 1, 2005
- Volume 32, No. 2, 2004
- Volume 32, No. 1, 2004
- Volume 31, No. 2, 2003
- Volume 31, No. 1, 2003
- Volume 30, No. 2, 2002
- Volume 30, No. 1, 2002
- Volume 29, No. 2, 2001
- Volume 29, No. 1, 2001
- Volume 28, No. 2, 2000
- Volume 28, No. 1, 2000
Volumes 18-27 (1990-99)
- Volume 27, No. 1 & 2, 1999
- Volume 26, No. 1 & 2, 1998
- Volume 24, No. 1 & 2, 1996
- Volume 25, No. 1 & 2, 1997
- Volume 23, No. 2, 1995
- Volume 23, No. 1, 1995
- Volume 22, No. 2, 1994
- Volume 22, No. 1, 1994
- Volume 21, No. 1 & 2, 1993
- Volume 20, No. 1 & 2, 1992
- Volume 19, No. 1, 1991
- Volume 18, No. 1 & 2, 1990
Volumes 5-17 (1978-89) a.k.a 'Cormorant'
- Volume 17, No. 1 & 2, 1989
- Volume 16, No. 1, 1988
- Volume 16, No. 2, 1988
- Volume 15, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 14, No. 1 & 2, 1987
- Volume 13, No. 2, 1986
- Volume 13, No. 1, 1986
- Volume 12, No. 2, 1985
- Volume 12, No. 1, 1985
- Volume 11, No. 1 & 2, 1984
- Volume 10, No. 2, 1983
- Volume 10, No. 1, 1983
- Volume 9, No. 2, 1982
- Volume 9, No. 1, 1982
- Volume 8, No. 2, 1981
- Volume 8, No. 1, 1981
- Volume 7, 1980
- Volume 5, 1978
Search by author or title:
Bridging the gap from student to senior scientist: recommendations for engaging early-career scientists in professional biological societies
Citation
HUMPHRIES, G.R.W., FLEMMING, S.A., GLADICS, A.J., HAMMER, S., HART, K.A., HIRATA, K., ANTOLOS, M., KAPPES, P.J., MAGNUSDOTTIR, E., MAJOR, H.L., McDUIE, F., McOMBER, K., ORBEN, R.A., SCHMID, M.S. & WILLE, M. 2016. Bridging the gap from student to senior scientist: recommendations for engaging early-career scientists in professional biological societies.
Marine Ornithology 44: 157
- 166
http://doi.org/10.5038/2074-1235.44.2.1174
Received 18 November 2015, accepted 22 April 2016
Date Published: 2016/10/15
Date Online: 2017/02/28
Key words: professional societies, early-career scientists, recruitment, engagement, senior scientists, guidelines
Abstract
Despite their long-standing and central role in the dissemination, promotion and defense of science, scientific societies currently face a unique combination of economic, social and technological changes. As a result, one of the most pressing challenges facing many societies is declining membership due to reduced recruitment and a failure to retain members, particularly early-career scientists (ECSs). To ensure that professional biological societies retain long-term viability and relevance, the recruitment and retention of ECSs needs to be a main priority. Here we propose a series of recommendations that we, a group of ECSs, believe will help professional societies better integrate and retain ECSs. We discuss each recommendation and detail its implementation using examples from our personal experiences in the global seabird research and management communities and from our collective experience as members of several professional societies. We believe these recommendations will not only help recruit and retain ECSs as society members, but will also directly benefit the organizations themselves.
References
BIK, H.M. & GOLDSTEIN, M.C. 2013. An introduction to social media for scientists. PLOS Biology 11: e1001535.
CARROLL, C. 2014. Can a conservation-oriented scientific society remain relevant in the 21st Century? [Editorial] Conservation Biology 28: 1137-1138.
CARROLL, C., NOSS, R.F., HILTY, J. & TROMBULAK, C. 2009. Solving SCB's Membership crisis by reinvigorating the sections: response to Schwartz et al. Conservation Biology 23: 5-6.
DUGGAN, M. & BRENNER, J. 2013. The Demographics of Social Media Users – 2012. Pew Research Center. (Available online at: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Social-media-users.aspx. Accessed 7 June 2016.)
FRITZ, M., DESHPANDE, B.N., BOUCHARD, F. ET AL. 2015. Brief communication: Future avenues for permafrost science from the perspective of early career researchers. Cryosphere: Discussions 9: 1209-1225.
HAMPTON, S.E. & PARKER, J.N. 2011. Collaboration and productivity in scientific synthesis. BioScience 61: 900–910.
HURD, J.M. 2000. The transformation of scientific communication: a model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51: 1279-1283.
LAUBER, T.B., TAYLOR, E.J. & DECKER, D.J. 2010. Factors influencing membership of federal wildlife biologists in The Wildlife Society. Journal of Wildlife Management 73: 980-988.
LESLIE, D.M. 2007. A shifting mosaic of scholarly publishing, scientific delivery, and future impact changing the face of learned societies. Journal of Mammology 88: 275-286.
MUSANTE, S. & POTTER, S. 2012. What is important to biological societies at the start of the twenty-first century? BioScience 62: 329-335.
POTTER, S., MUSANTE, S. & HOCHBERG, A. 2013. Dynamism is the new stasis: modern challenges for the biological sciences. BioScience 63: 705-714.
SCHWARTZ, M.W., HUNTER, M.L. & BOERSMA, P.D. 2008. Scientific societies in the 21st Century: a membership crisis. Conservation Biology 22: 1087-1089.
SHIFFMAN, D.S. 2012. Twitter as a tool for conservation education and outreach: what scientific conferences can do to promote live-tweeting. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2: 257-262.